Download the mobile application google play Download the mobile application app store
go to:

Annual Report 1999

02/01/2000
 

For infringements of obligations arising from the legal regulations CAFIA imposed penalties in administrative actions.

Other forms of sanctions are bans, reclassification of products and foodstuffs into adequate quality classes, liquidation of unhealthy products, food and raw materials, and some measures to remove the non-conformances. If some non-conformances were detected, inspections were subsequently repeated.

Penalties

CAFIA imposed 3,176 penalties in administrative proceedings in 1999, in total of CZK 24,769,000. After Food Law entered into force, the financial amount of penalties started to rise in comparison with the past.

graf3.jpg

Chart 3 - Comparsion of penalties for the previous years (mil. CZK / Year)

Often, during inspections carried out in one business person, several non-conformances are detected at the same time. Therefore, penalties are not usually imposed for individual non-conformances, but collectively for more non-conformances (the penalty can thus include even 6 reasons).

  • The most frequent reason for imposing penalties in administrative proceedings were non-observance of obligation arising form Section 10, paragraph 1, of the Food Law - altogether 2705 cases. The financial amount of penalties for infringement of such obligations reached a total of CZK 17,139,000. Note: Section 10, par. 1) of the Food Law prohibits to release into circulation foodstuffs other than safe, falsely labelled, with an expired date of use and of unknown origin.
  • Infringement of obligation stated in Section 6 of the Food Law (sets obligations for labelling of packed foodstuffs) gave reason to imposing a penalty in altogether 873 cases, which represents CZK 1,264,000.
  • Infringement of obligation set in Section 11, par. 1), letter d) of the Food Law (sets obligations to separate and clearly identify foodstuffs that can be used differently independent of their original use, and foodstuffs with expired date of minimum durability) gave reason to impose a penalty in altogether 1,263 cases, which represents the total of CZK 1,289,000.
  • Infringement of other obligations (e.g. non-observance of obligations in releasing into circulation the food packed and unpacked, etc.) gave reason to imposing a penalty in altogether 2,565 cases, which represents the total of CZK 5,077,000.

Bans

Bans in the total value of CZK 48,951,000 were imposed on food that did not comply with the set requirements.

The part coming from production reached CZK 7,228,000 and from shops CZK 41,723,000 (domestic products - CZK 9,215,000, and imported products - CZK 32,508,000).

graf4.jpg

Chart 4 - Proportion of bans imposed on domestic/imported products in shops (in CZK)

Examples of some notable bans

  • Two kinds of imported wine were banned in shops (Tetrapack packing) in the quantity of 22,192 litres and value of CZK 730,113. The reason was not-corresponding amount of alcohol with respect to labelling ad some non-conformances in quality.
  • Two kinds of spirits were banned in a producer in the quantity of 2000 litres and value of more than CZK 670,000. The reason was a lower content of alcohol than specified on the label and a MRL exceeding limit of ethylcarbamate.
  • 10,944 litres of a beverage for special ditary usewere banned in a direct importer, in the value of CZK 8,709,120. The reason for the ban: releasing into circulation without an approval of the Ministry of Health; detected some substances that have not yet been set forth in a decree.
  • Altogether 67 kinds of food for special dietary use were banned in a direct importer in the total quantity of 5,623 KG and value of CZK 3,156,864. The reason for the ban: releasing into circulation without an approval of the Ministry of Health; incorrect labelling.