Květná 15, 603 00 Brno, epodatelna

Data box ID: avraiqg
IČO: 75014149, DIČ: CZ75014149
Privacy Policy
The inspection focused on the determination of the contents of ochratoxin A in coffee took place in September 1999.
The subject matter of inspection were ground roasted coffee seeds and instant coffee, the samples of which were taken in retail shops, wholesale or dispatch stores of the producers. Altogether 28 samples of coffee were analysed for ochratoxin A, while all samples complied with the limit; although 2 samples of coffee got close to the set limit for the contents of ochratoxin A. The batches inspected represented a total quantity of 3,764 KG of coffee. The results obtained served as a suggestion in drawing out a plan of inspection for 2000.
Determination of additives
Within the range of determination of additives, analyses of cold sauces, non-maturing cheeses (soft and packed slices) and fruit spreads.
The analysis of cold sauces that focused mainly on benzoic and sorbic acids, and curcumine took place in July and August 1999. Altogether 27 samples taken from production and retail shops (representing the quantity of 6,523 KG and 13,234 litres) were analysed. 2 samples exceeded the maximum limits set for the contents of sorbic and benzoic acids.
Analyses of non-maturing cheese (soft and packed slices) with a focus on the contents of sorbic and benzoic acids took place in June 1999. Sampling was carried out in the retail chain. During the inspection 56 samples of cheeses were analysed (28 of imported and 28 of domestic products). 3 samples of imported products did not comply due to the limit exceeding contents of sorbic acid.
Analyses of fruit spreads (jams, marmalades, jellies) either low fat or without sugar added took place in October 1999 and focused on the values of preservatives (sorbic and benzoic acids, sulphur dioxide), sweetener substitutes (cyclamates, acesulpham K) and dyes. The inspection concentrated on the production, wholesale and retail. In total 28 samples were analysed during the inspection. In the determination of the contents of additives all samples complied with the limit. 6 samples did not conform due to labelling, but the false labelling did not relate to additives.